A low-stakes poker player who sued a London casino after being banned for alleged “hit-and-run” tactics has ended up losing the legal battle, and now faces a substantial legal bill himself.
The player involved, Dr. Mortaza Sahibzada, claimed he was unfairly banned from the famous Hippodrome Casino poker room after repeatedly cashing out shortly after winning small amounts at cash game tables. According to reports, Sahibzada described himself as an “expert in safe gambling” and argued that his disciplined poker strategy should not have resulted in a permanent ban.
Poker Player Files £100,000 Lawsuit
Sahibzada regularly played inside the PokerStars LIVE Hippodrome Poker Room in London, a well-known venue that has hosted major poker events including the European Poker Tour (EPT).
The player explained in court that his strategy was simple, win a modest amount, typically around £75, and then immediately leave the game, even if he had only recently sat down at the table. He claimed the approach helped him consistently earn nearly £2,000 per month through low-stakes poker cash games.
However, the repeated “hit-and-run” behavior reportedly frustrated both casino management and regular poker players. In live poker culture, quickly leaving after winning a pot is often viewed as poor etiquette, especially when done consistently.
Following the permanent ban, Sahibzada launched a £100,000 lawsuit against the casino, alleging unfair treatment and discrimination.
Court Hears Poker Etiquette Dispute
During proceedings at the Central London County Court, Sahibzada argued that casino management unfairly sided with players who disliked his disciplined strategy. He maintained that there was no official rule against leaving games after winning.
Casino representatives, however, told the court the player had been suspended due to “a number of unpleasant interactions with staff” along with concerns surrounding problem gambling behavior.
The court also heard that Dr. Sahibzada, a former engineering researcher, had around $17,000 in recorded live tournament cashes on The Hendon Mob database, although he had not posted a live score since 2018.
Discrimination Claims Rejected
Sahibzada further claimed that criticism from other poker players was racially motivated and cited the UK Equality Act 2010 during the case.
“They don’t like foreigners winning,” he reportedly stated in court, while also clarifying that he does not consider himself a foreigner.
Judge Andrew Holmes ultimately rejected the discrimination claims, ruling there was no evidence supporting the allegations. The judge stated that the casino had every right to decide who could enter its premises and use its services.
The lawsuit was dismissed, and Sahibzada was ordered to pay approximately £11,000 in legal costs.
Poker Community Reacts
The story has generated significant debate within the poker world, particularly regarding live cash game etiquette and player freedom. While some poker players believe anyone should be free to leave a cash game whenever they choose, others argue that repeated hit-and-run tactics negatively impact the poker ecosystem and overall table experience.
Despite the controversy, the Hippodrome Poker Room reportedly does not have any official rule specifically prohibiting hit-and-run behavior.
The venue remains one of Europe’s most recognized poker destinations and has hosted numerous high-profile tournaments and PokerStars events over the years.
For more poker news, online poker updates, cash game strategy, and tournament coverage, visit poker club games
FAQs
1. What is a hit-and-run in poker?
Winning a pot and quickly leaving the table.
2. Why was the poker player banned?
The casino cited repeated hit-and-run behavior and staff concerns.
3. Did the player win the lawsuit?
No, the court ruled in favor of the casino.
4. Are hit-and-runs against poker rules?
Usually no, but many players dislike the tactic.
5. How much did the player pay in legal fees?
Approximately £11,000.
